The association between total phthalate concentration and non-communicable diseases and chronic inflammation in South Australian urban dwelling men - ScienceDirect

 Objective
To investigate associations between urinary total phthalate concentration, chronic low-grade inflammation and non-communicable diseases in a cohort of South Australian men.
Methods
1504 men aged 39–84 years who provided a urinary sample at the follow-up visit of the Men Androgen Inflammation Lifestyle Environment and Stress (MAILES) study, a randomly-selected group of urban-dwelling, community-based men from Adelaide, Australia (n = 2038; study participation rate: 78.1%). Total phthalate concentration was quantified in fasting morning urine samples. Chronic diseases were assessed through self-report questionnaire or directly measured using standardised clinical and laboratory procedures. Inflammatory biomarkers were assayed by ELISA or spectroscopy. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were applied to determine associations of log-transformed urinary phthalate concentration with inflammation and chronic disease.
Results
Total phthalates were detected in 99.6% of urinary samples; geometric mean (95% CI) was 114.1 (109.5–118.9) µg/g creatinine. Higher total phthalate levels were associated with higher levels of hs-CRP, IL-6 (all p < 0.05) and TNF-α but not MPO. Urinary total phthalate concentrations were positively associated with cardiovascular disease, type-2-diabetes and hypertension. Comparing extreme quartiles of total phthalate, prevalence ratios were 1.78 (95% CI 1.17 – 2.71, p-trend = 0.001) for cardiovascular disease and 1.84 (95%CI 1.34 – 2.51, p-trend = 0.001) for type-2-diabetes and 1.14 (95%CI 1.01 – 1.29, p-trend = 0.013) for hypertension. Total phthalates and asthma and depression were not significantly associated.
Conclusion
A positive association between total phthalates and cardiovascular disease, type-2-diabetes, hypertension and increased levels of chronic low-grade inflammatory biomarkers was observed in urban-dwelling Australian men."



'via Blog this'

No comments: